Cyber leaders seem to proudly point to bringing in outside
consultants to convince executive to take action on items that have lingered
for years. Social media is full of threads of such proud proclamations by both cyber leaders and consultants.
Wait. What?!?
Critical items that have lingered for years? An outsider with more trust? Something else seems broken there.
Critical items that have lingered for years? An outsider with more trust? Something else seems broken there.
Let me restate the issue:
A vendor came in and within a short time put together compelling communications, a need for prioritization, and a plan that
were understandable enough to resonate with the executive team and convince them to take action on something really important but that the cyber leader wouldn't (or couldn't) shape or gain traction for years with the same executive team.
Read the above again. Can you see the problem now?
There are only a few unfortunate conclusions that can be met
Those conversations simply never happened
Conversations that did happen were not understandable
Understandable conversations weren’t compelling
Compelling conversations didn’t have an associated achievable
plan
The executives have lost
confidence in the cyber leadership
The hard message here is that all of the above are leadership
problems.
The first few might even be
indicative of a cyber leader that has wholly abdicated their responsibility to the
cyber program. Or, bringing the wrong skills to the role rather than the executive communications and negotiation skills that are needed. Both are extremely problematic. This might explain why that same leader proudly points to having
outsourced the conversations with executives or the quality of those
conversations.
Cyber team members, the organization, and the Board all deserve better.
Consultants are necessary but left un-managed they’ll sell
what is most beneficial to them. When what is most beneficial to them overlaps
with your organization’s needs, you have a match. The ground level view of issues makes sense particularly when assuming a new role. But, that isn’t always the case.
You can successfully outsource work but you can’t successfully outsource the
program leadership, program direction, or liability for a breach.
As cyber leaders, these are ours to own.
Like what you've read
enough to follow me on Twitter? @Opinionatedsec1.
SEE ALSO
No comments:
Post a Comment